Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Dhamakapella - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Whiteguru (talk | contribs) at 09:12, 14 January 2021 (Keep: A cappella genre is challenging). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:12, 14 January 2021 by Whiteguru (talk | contribs) (Keep: A cappella genre is challenging)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Dhamakapella

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Dhamakapella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:GNG and WP:BAND. All cited sources are either self-publications or trivial references. Bestagon (talk) 00:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Most of the reviews are from this site here which seems to be a website with a staff rather than an open online forum, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Yes, but anyone can submit their album to be reviewed by volunteer reviewers, per the link you sent. If that confers notability I can be a notable singer within three weeks (per the site)! Bestagon (talk) 06:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories: