This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Silence of Lambs (talk | contribs) at 05:58, 12 April 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:58, 12 April 2021 by Silence of Lambs (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) "WP:ARC" redirects here. For a guide on talk page archiving, see H:ARC.Shortcut
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
China-Taiwan articles | 12 April 2021 | 0/0/0 |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
China-Taiwan articles
Initiated by Silence of Lambs (talk) at 05:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Silence of Lambs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Félix An (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- JMonkey2006 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- DrIdiot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Chipmunkdavis (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Matt Smith (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- DMacks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Link 1
- Link 2
Statement by Silence of Lambs
On the Talk:China page which I requested to rename the articles China to People’s Republic of China and Taiwan to Republic of China because Two Chinas exist, the change was turned down per WP:COMMONNAME. In addition to above, because a dozen edits on the PRC-ROC articles were constantly reverted most of the time, I am calling for the 30/500 enforcement on any China-related articles similar to the Arab-Israeli conflict arbitration and the ones found at India-Pakistan. Although I am not good with long words, the scope would target Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan-related articles such as the Tibet Area (administrative division) reverted by User:Kautilya3 without consensus.
Statement by Félix An
Statement by JMonkey2006
Statement by DrIdiot
Statement by Chipmunkdavis
Statement by Matt Smith
Statement by DMacks
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
China-Taiwan articles: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
China-Taiwan articles: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>-China-Taiwan_articles">
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)