This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NuclearUmpf (talk | contribs) at 20:17, 22 January 2007 (rv to bov, and per concensus on talk page.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:17, 22 January 2007 by NuclearUmpf (talk | contribs) (rv to bov, and per concensus on talk page.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)9/11 Alternative Theory template
The template is intended to make no comment on any of the articles linked to. Its role is solely to assist navigation by researchers who wish to find articles on this topic with ease.
When adding articles to the template please do so in alphabetical order. When adding an article to the template do not forget to add the template to the article. Simply add {{911ct}} directly above the categories the article is part of.
| This template must be substituted. Replace {{Template for discussion ...}} with {{subst:Template for discussion ...}}.9/11 Alternative theories Alternative theories, hypotheses, proponents & supporters | |
| Conspiracy theories and hypotheses | |
| Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center | |
| Proponents and supporters of such theories and hypotheses | |
| David Ray Griffin | Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed | Kevin Barrett | Robert M. Bowman | Andreas von Bülow | James Fetzer | Sander Hicks | Jim Hoffman | Alex Jones | Steven E. Jones | Michael Ruppert | Peter Dale Scott | Webster G. Tarpley | Barrie Zwicker | |
| Groups supporting such theories and hypotheses | |
| 9/11 Citizens Watch | Family Steering Committee | Jersey Girls | Scholars for 9/11 Truth | |
| Movies regarding theories and hypotheses | |
| Loose Change | |
| Books regarding theories and hypotheses | |
| 9/11: The Big Lie | The CIA and September | The New Pearl Harbor | The Terror Timeline | The War on Freedom | |
| Popular culture | |
This template is intended to be deployed at the foot of the various 9/11 articles that do not favour the official explanation, and on article pages of people and organisations who are proponents of, or are linked in some manner with, such articles. Popular culture references are to (eg) TV shows where the existence of such a theory is fundamental to the show/edition and is "taken as read" to exist.