This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spiderone (talk | contribs) at 09:24, 30 October 2021 (Updating nomination page with notices and new AFDC cat (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:24, 30 October 2021 by Spiderone (talk | contribs) (Updating nomination page with notices and new AFDC cat (assisted))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)East Taihang Glasswalk
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- East Taihang Glasswalk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hasn't been edited in a year and requires more information to meet wikipedia's general notability guideline The furret lover (talk) 00:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. The furret lover (talk) 00:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly passes a WP:BEFORE check, with coverage in Atlas Obscura, Archinect, Mashable, Architizer, Lonely Planet, The Guardian, and The Straits Times, and that's just on the first page of Google. WP:NEGLECT and WP:NOIMPROVEMENT are not reasons to delete. — GhostRiver 03:45, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- keep per GhostRiver. I did a search earlier and came up with some of the same sources and many more in Chinese. I am sure I recall some of the coverage of it, before I was drawn to this article by deletion sorting. I.e. it may only be a fancy footbridge, but one with significant international coverage.--JohnBlackburnedeeds 05:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:24, 30 October 2021 (UTC)