This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 06:45, 14 April 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:45, 14 April 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Turdilinear Forms
An architectural movement prodded as hoax, tag removed by creator with no explanation and no references provided. Reprodded as a hoax presumably by someone who didn't check the page history. Moving here as a contested deletion. It doesn't Google, so I'm inclined to think it's a hoax. Unless we get some references, delete. NickelShoe 21:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax and complete bollocks, especially the “Shit Lock Dry Wall” system Fan1967 22:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Probably a speedy delete as a {{db-nonsense}} candidate. (aeropagitica) 23:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete unless some verification is forthcoming. --Aim Here 23:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Or maybe flush would be more appropriate. --Elkman - 03:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Lockley 22:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Fan1967 -- Alpha269 00:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.