This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Piotrus (talk | contribs) at 09:54, 31 July 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:54, 31 July 2022 by Piotrus (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Dragaera
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Dragaera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No WP:SIGCOV in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and so this does not meet Misplaced Pages's WP:NOTABILITY guideline. There are some trivial mentions that use this as the alternate name for the Khaavren Romances, but does not provide coverage of this topic separate from that. Jontesta (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 19:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Steven_Brust#The_Dragaeran_books. Clearly fancruft. The book series does not even have its own article, does not make sense for the world to have one. ‡ El cid, el campeador 20:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete/Redirect - does not meet the WP:GNG without significant coverage in reliable third party sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to the author. There is nothing showing this topic satisfies GNG. TTN (talk) 12:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Steven_Brust#Dragaera. Major fancruft/plot summary with zero evidence of significance (WP:GNG fail). Reasonable redirect, however. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:54, 31 July 2022 (UTC)