Talk:Eye color - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mvqr (talk | contribs) at 09:36, 23 October 2022 (→Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2022). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:36, 23 October 2022 by Mvqr (talk | contribs) (→Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2022)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eye color article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 2 months

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Eye color. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Eye color at the Reference desk.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Animal anatomy Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Anthropology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Why is editing blocked on an article with such poor sourcing?

"DNA studies on ancient human remains confirm that light skin, hair and eyes were present at least tens of thousands of years ago on Neanderthals, who lived in Eurasia for 500,000 years."

No, those sources don't say that -- especially the bit about "500,000 years," but more important (given the subject of the article) nothing "confirms" "light eyes" in Neanderthals, only light skin and red hair. Genes expressing blue eyes in modern homo sapiens were present but less dominant in a couple DNA samples mentioned in one of the articles, but that's it, and the article warns that the study is not widely accepted and that we ahve no way of knowing what the actual effect of thse genes would have been.

Yet there it is: DNA studies on ancient human remains confirm that light skin, hair and eyes were present at least tens of thousands of years ago on Neanderthals, who lived in Eurasia for 500,000 years.

Who besides me will actually READ all five of those sources? It's not unlikely that the original editor who contributed the sentences had racist motives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:cda0:9220:c1ea:12f4:f079:be78 (talk • contribs)

Photo race bias: Caucasian eyes

As far as I can tell, of the 34 photos of human eyes in this story, all are Caucasian except one photo of an east asian eye (repeated twice). As the article's text makes clear, it's not correct to assume that everyone except Caucasians has brown eyes. For instance, just googling "North African blue eyes" generates many striking photos, e.g. https://africageographic.com/stories/the-boy-with-the-sapphire-eyes/ It would be great if this article were more inclusive.

Replying: North Africans are also considered caucasian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:6E00:295:A320:359B:C31B:8FDB:DF3A (talk) 08:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Spelling

Inconsistent spelling of “grey or gray”, are we to use queen’s English or bastardized English. 150.143.179.27 (talk) 10:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Both forms are acceptable in both types of English, but I suppose we should us one consistently in this article. The article title is a bit of a clue as to what variety is used here.... Johnbod (talk) 15:13, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Cheers Johnbod for editing the spelling of the colour “grey” to be consistently wrong.

Hazel Eyes

The hazel eye section is misleading and ambiguous. Hazel eyes aren't a real eye colour and are very much open for interpretation. The colour hazel itself refers to the light golden brown of a hazel nut shell which was originally how hazel eyes were identified however it's not as common in modern times to refer to light/golden brown eyes as hazel as they would just be deemed brown so often people refer to multi coloured eyes with central heterochromia ei blue, grey or green eyes with brown around the pupil as hazel as they're not a solid easily identifiable colour and the brown around the pupil resembles that of the colour hazel. This being said the true colour of the eye is the outer colour (blue, grey or green) not the brown/golden central heterochromia around the pupil, which is a common condition amongst light eyed populations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:6E00:295:A320:359B:C31B:8FDB:DF3A (talk) 08:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Vladimir Putin

He has very sticking green eyes. Why isn't this discussed in any fashion on Misplaced Pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valgrus Thunderaxe (talk • contribs) 09:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The Introduction of this article states that eye color can be affected by up to 15 genes, but later in the article, it says that it can be affected by up to 16. I would like this to change to match 16, which I believe to be the correct number. WednesdayFireball (talk) 05:14, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Done, thank you for pointing this out. --Mvqr (talk) 09:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Categories: