Misplaced Pages

User talk:Saintrotter

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zzuuzz (talk | contribs) at 00:04, 4 March 2007 (→3RR block: comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:04, 4 March 2007 by Zzuuzz (talk | contribs) (→3RR block: comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, Saintrotter, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ¤~Persian Poet Gal 23:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Moscow

You are a member of WikiProject Russia. I wanted to let you know the article Moscow is in Misplaced Pages:Featured_article_candidates/Moscow list now. --Hirakawacho 10:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mamintb.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mamintb.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. AAA! 06:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I am interested and replied. --Saintrotter 3 March 2007

  • Warning
    Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Nardman1 20:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

People should refrain from undoing my work too. My picture is superior and I have stated why. I have fixed any problems in the picture as editing comments said. I'm sure I do not need to remind you the rules of wikipedia about being neutral and treating everyone the same? Yet I don't see any edit warnings and threats of being blocked on Hayford Peirce page for eiditing my work for only reason because he thinks it's racist for a black woman to have the same bright red lipstick as the white woman and I changed it to pink and he still cries racism and edits my work.

Saintrotter 3 March 2007

3RR block

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

-- zzuuzz 23:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I did discuss them fully in 4 different places.

Saintrotter 4 March 2007

The relevant part of the rule is to not continue reverting. -- zzuuzz 00:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)