Misplaced Pages

Godwin's law

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Evergreens78 (talk | contribs) at 01:59, 16 March 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:59, 16 March 2007 by Evergreens78 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Spoken Misplaced Pages|Godwin's_law.ogg|2006-07-01}} Godwin's Law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies) is a mainstay of Internet culture, an adage formulated by Mike Godwin in 1990. The law states:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.

Godwin's Law does not dispute whether any particular reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be apt. It is precisely because such a comparison or reference may sometimes be appropriate, Godwin has argued, that overuse of the Nazi/Hitler comparison should be avoided, as it robs the valid comparisons of their impact.

Although in one of its early forms Godwin's Law referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions, the law is now applied to any threaded online discussion: electronic mailing lists, message boards, chat rooms, and more recently blog comment threads and wiki talk pages.

Godwin has stated that he introduced Godwin's law as an experiment in memetics.

Corollaries and usage

There is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically "lost" whatever debate was in progress. This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's Law. Thus Godwin's Law serves to impose an upper bound on thread length in general. It is considered poor form to raise arbitrarily such a comparison with the motive of ending the thread. There is a widely recognized codicil that any such ulterior-motive invocation of Godwin's Law will be unsuccessful (this is sometimes referred to as "Quirk's Exception").

Godwin's Law does not apply to discussions directly addressing genocide, propaganda or other mainstays of the Nazi regime. Instead, it applies to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons of other situations to Hitler or Nazis. However, Godwin's Law can itself also be abused, as a distraction or diversion, to fallaciously miscast an opponent's argument as hyperbole, especially if the comparison the argument made were actually appropriate.

See also

Notes and references

Footnotes

  1. ^ Godwin, Mike (2004-10-01). "Meme, Counter-meme". Wired Magazine. Retrieved 2006-03-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  2. Cyber Rights: Defending Free Speech in the Digital Age
  3. Godwin, Mike (1991-08-18). "Re: Nazis (was Re: Card's Article on Homosexuality". Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf-lovers. 1991Aug18.215029.19421@eff.org. {{cite newsgroup}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. "The Jargon File (4.4.7)". Retrieved 03-01-2007. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)

Other references

External links

Related information

Notable citations to Godwin's law

Categories: