Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/AaNet - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FiggyBee (talk | contribs) at 18:53, 19 March 2007 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:53, 19 March 2007 by FiggyBee (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

AaNet

Article has no independent source and fails to source its statements. and per Jimbo no text is better than having unsourced Betacommand 15:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Comment it seems a little WP:POINT to put an article up for deletion solely because it doesn't have any independent references, especially when the article contains no bold or controversial claims (even a little detective work will confirm that aaNet at least exists). FiggyBee 18:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)