Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Wizard of Oz

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tiggerjay (talk | contribs) at 19:13, 22 August 2023 (Requested move 21 August 2023: +note). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:13, 22 August 2023 by Tiggerjay (talk | contribs) (Requested move 21 August 2023: +note)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wizard of Oz article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 30 days 

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconOz (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Oz, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OzWikipedia:WikiProject OzTemplate:WikiProject OzOz
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Cinema Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Top-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLibrary of Congress Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFilm: Core / American
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is on the project's core list.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconKansas Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDisability
WikiProject iconThe Wizard of Oz is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

To-do list for The Wizard of Oz: edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2024-03-05

  • Cite many, many more references
  • Copyedit article

The Wizard Of Oz premiered in the San Francisco Bay Area at the Oakland Paramount, on August 17, 1939, the same day it premiered in New York at Loew's Capitol Theatre. This can be confirmed by newspaper ads in the Oakland Tribune, Bancroft Library; and by Oakland Paramount advertising cards.

On 30 October 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to The Wizard of Oz. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Unsourced material

Below information was tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Richard Thorpe as director
====Richard Thorpe as director====
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Principal photography for The Wizard of Oz started on October 13, 1938, on the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer studio lot in Culver City, California, with Richard Thorpe as director, replacing original director Norman Taurog, who filmed a few early Technicolor tests and was then reassigned. Thorpe initially shot about two weeks of footage, nine days in total, involving Dorothy's first encounter with the Scarecrow, and a number of sequences in the Wicked Witch's castle, such as Dorothy's rescue, which, though unreleased, includes the only footage of Buddy Ebsen's Tin Man.

DonIago (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 21 August 2023

It has been proposed in this section that The Wizard of Oz be renamed and moved to The Wizard of Oz (film).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.


Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current logtarget logdirect move

The Wizard of Oz (1939 film)The Wizard of Oz (film) – This is the most widely known film out of all the films. We can and should add a hatnote that will point them to the disambiguation page linking the other lesser known movies. Interstellarity (talk) 23:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

It should be noted that "the proposed title already redirects to the current title" only as of a couple of hours ago. This nomination was posted at 23:55, 21 August 2023 and the redirect was moved two minutes later at 23:57. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 03:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Which was made by the nom above, and subsequently reverted TiggerJay(talk) 19:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Support per WP:INCDAB. Even though the The Wizard of Oz (film) redirect gets fewer than 1 hit per day, almost all of those few surely expect to land on the famous film. - Station1 (talk) 01:47, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
  • I'd have to say Oppose on this one, as while the 1939 film might appear to be the obvious primary topic, there are two other films that get non-negligible hits, so it will simply be confusing for readers to move this page to an incomplete disambiguation and make it difficult for them to find any other film. It's understandable that this film has many fans but that shouldn't come at the cost of damaging navigation. The proposed title also does not redirect to the current title, that was modified by nom prior to this move request when it really should not have been until consensus was reached. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 10:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Strong support per INCDAB. All other films of the same title aren't in the same league. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Oppose - this addition of ambiguity adds nothing to the readers' or editors' experience. -- Netoholic @ 13:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Not an improvement, in my view. Let's keep it the way it is now. Jusdafax (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Categories: