Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Kurdistan - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 04:29, 22 September 2023 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Kurdistan/Archive 5) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:29, 22 September 2023 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Kurdistan/Archive 5) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconKurdistan Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Kurdistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Misplaced Pages editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

recursive categories associated with this project

Posting this here because categories aren't in my normal bailiwick.

In doing something unrelated to this project, I discovered that Category:Kurdistan Workers' Party is recursive. If you follow this subcategory path you will end up back at Category:Kurdistan Workers' Party:

Category:Kurdistan Workers' Party
Category:History of the Kurdistan Workers' Party
Category:Kurdistan Workers' Party attacks
Category:Kurdish–Turkish conflict (2015–present)
Category:Peoples' United Revolutionary Movement

Category:Peoples' United Revolutionary Movement has Category:Kurdistan Workers' Party as a subcategory.

I suspect that recursion is not desired but will leave it for others to fix if fixing is appropriate.

Trappist the monk (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Also: Category:PeshmergaCategory:Military operations involving the PeshmergaCategory:Wars involving the PeshmergaCategory:Iraqi insurgency (2011–2013)Category:Anti-ISIL factions in IraqCategory:Peshmerga.
Trappist the monk (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon

Hello WikiProject Kurdistan:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 14:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC) Categories: