Misplaced Pages

Talk:Andy Looney

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amalas (talk | contribs) at 05:38, 7 April 2007 (→References in General: looks great). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:38, 7 April 2007 by Amalas (talk | contribs) (→References in General: looks great)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconBiography Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconBoard and table games Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Fluxx Mensa Mind Games award

In trying to add some references, I note that Fluxx won the Mensa Mind Games award in 1999, but the Mensa site that lists the Past Winners won't allow me to go directly to the page - someone would have to select the year to see it won the award. How best should I cite this? --Timotab 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Good question!  :) The answer is, something doesn't have to be online to be cited -- it just needs to be a reliable source. See WP:CITE and WP:ATT for more info. In a nutshell though: Cite something in such a way that an independent editor, not familiar with the subject, could verify the information. --Elonka 03:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

References in General

Full Disclosure: I'm a fan of the Looney Labs Product line, so I'm presenting references here for others to look at and review, to avoid any appearance of COI.


Fluxx was also number 34 in the National Games Week top 100 played games of 2006

There was also an article published in Games Magazine In October 2005. I have a copy of the content of the article, and have no reason to believe it's not genuine, but the copy of that content is not from a reliable source. I'm trying to get my hands on the October 2005 edition of the magazine to verify it, but even if I do, how would one cite that?

--Timotab 03:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

also found a review of Aquarius in The Missoulian (a local Montana newspaper) --Timotab 04:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I couldn't get the National Games Week link to work. Is there a better source for that information?
The Games Magazine would be a great source, and you can probably use {{citation}} within a <ref>.
Andy blah blah something blah<ref name="gamesmag">{{Citation | last = | first = | author-link = | last2 = | first2 = | author2-link = | title = | newspaper = | pages = | year = | date = | url = }}</ref>. More stuff, blah blah.
If you need help with that, let me know. More information can be found here and here.
I do remember reading that Montana newspaper article, but I'm not sure what information we could pull from it.
Good luck with the cleanup and referencing! ~ Amalas rawr 13:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
    • The NGW page seems to have gone in the last day or two! I've emailed them to see what's up and am looking for an alternate source for that info. Otherwise, I've added a number of other citations. Does that look a bit better now?--Timotab 22:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
      • Whee! References! Looking great! Thanks for all the sources and such. I'm more of a cleanup person, so I appreciate anyone who does the research. ~ Amalas rawr 05:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Categories: