This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tommygunn7886 (talk | contribs) at 17:51, 25 May 2024. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:51, 25 May 2024 by Tommygunn7886 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please use edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I noticed that your recent edit to Eye color did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Misplaced Pages account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! Adakiko (talk) 20:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Notice: Administrator's noticeboard report
This message is to notify you that a discussion has been created at the Administrator's noticeboard regarding your recent behavior. Here is the link to that discussion. A Rainbow Footing It (talk) 04:24, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Discussion moved to the following location: A Rainbow Footing It (talk) 04:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
- You failed to substantiate your grave personal attacks. The other editor seems to have neutrally summarized what a published source said. When your block expires, you are obligated to comply with Assume good faith. Cullen328 (talk) 06:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also WP:3RR. And in my opinion a dose of WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Not to mention making the article say the literal opposite of what you intend. Take a step back and see how things have gone off track and come back and make it right. There are proper ways to pursue the changes you think should be made. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.