This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MrHaligonian (talk | contribs) at 14:41, 17 June 2024 (Cleared addressed messages). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:41, 17 June 2024 by MrHaligonian (talk | contribs) (Cleared addressed messages)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)June 2024
Please do not add content or create pages that exist solely to attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Misplaced Pages and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Thank you. Extremely negative claims based on the prosecution, not on a conviction, are not allowed on Misplaced Pages (WP:BLP, also applies to the recently deceased). Please don't reinsert the information again. Fram (talk) 14:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Fram,
- This is the full section you removed:
- Please look at the CPSNS settlement agreement at https://cpsns.ns.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Settlement-Agreement-Dr.-Curtis-Steele.pdf
- I can understand if you wish to remove the part I just bolded above - that would be meeting your comment about "extremely negative claims based on the prosecution". However, given that the fact of taking nude photos of a minor was proven in an investigation conducted by CPSNS, and they held a judicial process (Hearing Committee) that determined he was to have his licence to practice medicine revoked, and this made national news, what would be your rationale for removing the entire section and not simply the part about unproven charges? Can we find a compromise where we agree to simply remove the bolded part and restore the section? Is there an admin we can tag who can adjudicate this dispute and decide if the entire section need be removed or only the part about withdraw child porn charges? MrHaligonian (talk) 14:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- BLP applies to every page. Reposting the removed content here is not a wise move. And all we have is one doctor removed for alleged serious misconduct, not really well placed in an article about systematic, widespread issues. It just makes it look like a WP:COATRACK where a frankly minor (as in, individual) case is included to either make the general issues seem bigger, or to attack that doctor. Fram (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)