This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ChristieBot (talk | contribs) at 05:01, 1 September 2024 (Adding nominator information). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:01, 1 September 2024 by ChristieBot (talk | contribs) (Adding nominator information)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 01:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Vkwiki100 (talk · contribs) 04:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
@Vestrian24Bio: I'll be reviewing this one. VK wiki100 04:44, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: