This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Z1720 (talk | contribs) at 20:44, 13 September 2024 (→Good article reassessment for Cristina Fernández de Kirchner: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:44, 13 September 2024 by Z1720 (talk | contribs) (→Good article reassessment for Cristina Fernández de Kirchner: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's History and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 12 March 2012. |
WikiProject Women's History
Quick Menu (edit · changes)- Main · Discuss the Project
- Recognized content
- Members
- Resources
- Assessment
- Article Alerts
- Popular pages
- Templates
- Did You Know
- Featured Pictures
- In this month
- Quotes
- Ask a question
- Requested articles
- Taskforces
 | On 6 March 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women's history. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
January 2020 at Women in Red
|
Cora Sue Collins
Hi. Can someone give some care and love to Cora Sue Collins please?
Sexual slavery in Islam
I would be grateful if some people with subject knowledge could assess the sweeping edits currently being done to that article. I'm getting the impression that this is the wholesale replacement of one interpretation with another, based on very selective sources, but I simply don't know the subject area. In any case I suspect these big deletes/replacements need some talk page discussion before being implemented. - Also notified WikiProject Islam. --Elmidae (talk · contribs)
GAR of Eva Perón
Eva Perón
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisting per general consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
GA from 2006, it was't reassessed. Half of the article is unsourced, with 'This article needs additional citations for verification.' on top, 5 'citation needed' tags and two 'This section does not cite any sources' templates (Female Peronist Party and women's suffrage and Honours), see also unsourced sections: Juan Perón's arrest, 1946 presidential election, European tour, Vice-presidential nomination, Re-election and Spiritual Leader of the Nation; and 19 'page needed' tags. Artem.G (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist - Article needs a lot of work to be kept as a GA. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist per above. Needs significant work. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
 
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Requested move at Talk:Edwina Mountbatten, Countess Mountbatten of Burma#Requested move 28 June 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Edwina Mountbatten, Countess Mountbatten of Burma#Requested move 28 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 07:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Good article reassessment for Mary McLeod Bethune
Mary McLeod Bethune has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 04:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'd love to keep this one green. Based on my availability and other commitments, I'd give myself a 50/50 chance of getting the article to a Keep. Is there anyone who can take lead on this and be more dedicated to it? I'd be happy to play a supporting role. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Lady Henry Somerset#Requested move 14 July 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lady Henry Somerset#Requested move 14 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • 22:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Requested move at Talk:Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis#Requested move 11 August 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis#Requested move 11 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Safari Scribe 05:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Good article reassessment for Brown v. Board of Education
Brown v. Board of Education has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello, sorry to bother, I hope the entry about geji, a female performer in ancient China, can be added to one of the women's history sections.
。I'm really sorry, but I think the Geji group of female performers is also part of the history of women, so I hope it can be added to the label of women's history.This entry is not perfect now. I have been slowly improving it, but due to controversy, I cannot edit it now. The sexual issues of this group of female performers are being held up. Some people must define them as sex workers and must think that all of them are prostitution.For the specific situation and explanation, please read all I said in the discussion forum, if it is convenient.https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:G%C4%93j%C3%AC I hope someone can have a discussion and define the identity of this group of female performers, rather than them continuing to be exported as they are now.I know this is presumptuous, but if anyone could help, I'd really appreciate it, thanks.Sorry to bother. 清风与明月 (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Beatrice of Bavaria#Requested move 1 September 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Beatrice of Bavaria#Requested move 1 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans 08:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Green's October 2024 edit-a-thon
Hello WikiProject Women's History:
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 14:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Historical pages without any links to women
I recently ran a script to find pages which had over 100 links to wikibios of men, and ZERO links to wikibios of women. These were the historical pages I found:
- Dutch East India Company (183 links to men, 0 to women)
- Edo period (176 links to men, 0 to women)
- Plautus (129 links to men, 0 to women)
- Sixteen Kingdoms (125 links to men, 0 to women)
- Austria-Hungary (110 links to men, 0 to women)
None of these are historical topics I know anything about. But there must surely be some relevant historical women to mention, or some relevant women historians to cite on these topics. I'd love the horrific link imbalance on these pages to be attenuated! Dsp13 (talk) 22:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Cristina Fernández de Kirchner
Cristina Fernández de Kirchner has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories: