This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs) at 21:00, 20 December 2024. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:00, 20 December 2024 by Lethargilistic (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) 2020 United States Supreme Court case| Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Decided December 10, 2020 | |
| Full case name | Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n |
| Docket no. | 18-540 |
| Citations | 592 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| State statutes are only preempted by ERISA if they have an "impermissible connection" to ERISA plans or they "refer to" ERISA plans. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that state statutes are only preempted by ERISA if they have an "impermissible connection" to ERISA plans or they "refer to" ERISA plans.
References
External links
- Text of Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Ass'n, No. 18-540, 592 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |