This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jéské Couriano (talk | contribs) at 04:30, 26 December 2024 (→Statement by {Non-party}: Respondent is blocked; filer should be TBanned or blocked for WP:BATTLE behaviour.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:30, 26 December 2024 by Jéské Couriano (talk | contribs) (→Statement by {Non-party}: Respondent is blocked; filer should be TBanned or blocked for WP:BATTLE behaviour.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) "WP:ARC" redirects here. For a guide on talk page archiving, see H:ARC. Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Sabotage of Lindy Li's page | 26 December 2024 | 0/0/0 |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Sabotage of Lindy Li's page
Initiated by Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) at 04:24, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Proposed parties
- Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- EncycloDeterminate (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Pppery#c-Deepfriedokra-20241225233600-Napoleonjosephine2020-20241225232900
- https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Napoleonjosephine2020
Statement by Napoleonjosephine2020
Dear Committee,
Someone made an inflammatory edit to Li's page that is intended to cast her in a negative light. On his own talk page (EncycloDeterminate), this same editor linked to a since-deleted tweet in which he attacked Lindy Li (the subject of the Misplaced Pages article) as an "opportunistic grifter".
He is also on Reddit posting about this editing war and openly admitted to disliking Li and admitted that his personal dislike could fairly in itself be grounds for removing his edit.
Anyone with clear animus and hatred for a subject should be barred from editing the subject's page. Would really appreciate your intervention. He deleted his X post after I shared it on a talk page but I have screenshots of both his X and Reddit posts and am happy to email them to all the parties concerned. I linked to his Reddit post but it was taken down.
I have tried many times to stop this self-avowed Kamala Harris supporter from sabotaging Li's page but I fear that those involved are ideologically biased and the consensus thus far has a partisan slant. Thank you so much for your time and consideration.
Statement by EncycloDeterminate
Statement by Jéské Couriano
The person being complained about got Oversighter-blocked indefinitely on 23 Dec. I get the feeling the filer also needs an indefinite sanction, ideally an indefinite ban from the AP2 area for trying to weaponise Arbitration to eliminate ideological opponents. Either way, this is hideously premature. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v 04:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Sabotage of Lindy Li's page: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Sabotage of Lindy Li's page: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>-Sabotage_of_Lindy_Li's_page">
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)