Misplaced Pages

Talk:Marjorie (song)/GA1

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Marjorie (song)

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by CatchMe (talk | contribs) at 15:53, 26 December 2024. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 15:53, 26 December 2024 by CatchMe (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GA Review

Passed. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 15:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 10:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: CatchMe (talk · contribs) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Ref 1 doesn't specifically support the preceding sentence as ref 2 does.
    • Removed it, please tell me if I should replace it with another source
      • The ref supports the sentence completely so it's fine as it is!
  • "...the pop maximalist sound..." - "the maximalist pop sound"?
    • Done
  • "After filming, the three celebrated by drinking and unexpectedly continued writing..." - is the drinking part relevant?
    • Replaced with "celeberated Folklore's success and and unexpectedly ..."
  • "...was composed from..." - "was composed using"?
    • Done
  • I have seen GAs using "synthesizers" instead of "synths".
    • Done
  • "...and one of Swift's better songs" - "and one of Swift's best songs".
    • Done
  • "nine out of 274" - change "nine" to "9" for consistency and per MOS:NUMNOTES.
    • Done. I completely forgot about MOS:NUMNOTES

This article is almost perfect for GA! I didn't even had to separate in sections as I usually do.. All good in the verifiable (and no copyright violations according to Earwig's Copyvio), broad, neutral, stable, and illustrated criteria. I will put this  On hold until some minor issues are addressed! CatchMe (talk · contribs) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Hey, CatchMe! I believe I've addressed all of your comments, let me know if anything needs further adjustments. Thanks so much for the review, I greatly appreciate it :)) Medxvo (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
@Medxvo: Excellent work! I see everything is fine so I will ✓ Pass this. Congrats and happy holidays!! CatchMe (talk · contribs) 15:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.