Misplaced Pages

:IRC channels/Misplaced Pages-en-admins - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:IRC channels

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by David Gerard (talk | contribs) at 19:36, 6 May 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:36, 6 May 2007 by David Gerard (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

#wikipedia-en-admins is a closed channel for administrators on the English Misplaced Pages. Many Commons admins, former admins and developers are there as well.

Purpose

There's a lot of chitchat, but it's basically somewhere to talk about admin work. It's also amazing how people who argue furiously on the wiki can be a lot nicer in real time. It's good for quickly asking questions. Admins are more likely to find a checkuser when they're in a hurry too.

The channel was created by Danny to deal with urgent living biography issues. Foundation staff and board members will often go onto the channel with a problem needing solving.

Conduct on the channel

The channel is private, but logs do leak. Comport yourself in a collegiate manner. Try not to disparage editors under discussion, it'll get back to them. You're an admin, you were picked for your judgement.

The channel is useful for double-checking yourself, but don't decide things based on an IRC discussion without noting it on WP:ANI for review. You might be wrong.

How to get access

  1. Get an IRC cloak here. (Sean then processes these by hand.)
  2. Request access on User talk:David Gerard, giving your cloak. (David then processes these by hand.)

David and JamesF would quite like all en:wp admins on this channel, particularly new ones. Though IRC is not mandatory to being an admin, and if anyone tries to make it a criterion for support at RFA they should be ignored as hard as possible.

See also