This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Petri Krohn (talk | contribs) at 20:45, 26 May 2007 (→Notice: WP:STALK). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:45, 26 May 2007 by Petri Krohn (talk | contribs) (→Notice: WP:STALK)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, Alexia Death, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Camptown 21:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Estonia
You wrote: "Nothing on talk page? hen put something on talk page instead of edit waring.)" Well, as you can see, I have started the discussion on the talk page some time ago: Talk:Estonia#Removing unreferenced claims. You did not realise that, I guess. People who revert my edits do not say anything on the talk page, they just revert. So, can you please revert your revert? Lantios 16:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- No I wont. Putting together a material for you takes time. You have given none. And edit war remains edit war. Please reach a consensus then edit. --Alexia Death 16:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- So, you did a reasonless revert to help Digwuren in an edit war because you do not like me. Lantios 16:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you don't consider stopping a pointless edit war a reason then yes. I promise that I will not do this again after the topics have been DISCUSSED in a sensible time frame and a consensus is reached. I have no particular opinion of you personally, as I don't know you.--Alexia Death 16:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Making a revert is a part of an edit war, not a method to stop it. I am the only one who tries to discuss the topic, others just revert and do not bother writing anything about my edits at the talk page. How are we supposed to reach consensus if you and Digwuren do nothing but revert? Lantios 16:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you're referring to , as you appear to have whined about that in the summary line of , you're merely displaying your impatience -- again. It is very hard to maintain even a veneer of WP:CIVIL addressing you after all your demagoguery and sophistry, you really shouldn't expect thorough responses to be written in a matter of minutes. Digwuren 17:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- How can anything be discussed if you don't even bother to list your grievances on the talk page. In one case you removed a SINGLE word. What was the claim that you associated with it? How come a SINGLE word needs a citation? --Alexia Death 16:31, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Look, I know that you will defend your position by any possible means. Just try to understand that what you do is not honest and try to avoid such actions in the future. Lantios 16:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- I honestly believe my actions are RIGHT(TM) and honest or I would not be engaging in them. Id like you to understand that I in turn find trying to "out run" your opponents not to be the the most honest thing to do... My respect for you can only grow when you stop screaming and actually start argumentation of your position. --Alexia Death 16:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Look, I know that you will defend your position by any possible means. Just try to understand that what you do is not honest and try to avoid such actions in the future. Lantios 16:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Making a revert is a part of an edit war, not a method to stop it. I am the only one who tries to discuss the topic, others just revert and do not bother writing anything about my edits at the talk page. How are we supposed to reach consensus if you and Digwuren do nothing but revert? Lantios 16:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you don't consider stopping a pointless edit war a reason then yes. I promise that I will not do this again after the topics have been DISCUSSED in a sensible time frame and a consensus is reached. I have no particular opinion of you personally, as I don't know you.--Alexia Death 16:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- So, you did a reasonless revert to help Digwuren in an edit war because you do not like me. Lantios 16:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Notice
I think that because you are also mentioned there you may be interested about that User:Petri Krohn/Evidence.--Staberinde 14:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. Its appreciated.--Alexia Death 14:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have reverted the wikilink to the page. The page is not linked from anywhere, and should not be. If you found it, it is only proof of stalking. -- Petri Krohn 20:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Edit summary at Congress of Estonia
I have a strong suspicion, that you are communicating off-line with User:Digwuren, possibly making you a meatpuppet. The edit summary was meant as a warning, I would consider further reverts a violation of the WP:3RR, and would file a checkuser request. I have now filed the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Digwuren. The most relevant issues here are however Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Republic of Estonia (1990-1991) and Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Estonian SSR (independent). -- Petri Krohn 20:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)