This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) at 05:07, 30 May 2007 (Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:Woohookitty/Archive19). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:07, 30 May 2007 by Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) (Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:Woohookitty/Archive19)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is Woohookitty's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
NICE EDITS!!
Thanks for the adds on Category:Film critics associations. I'll continue to put more up. ~Cnota
- Removed ].Cnota
Whoops!
Hey there I'm really sorry about that I didn't mean to move or delete anything but the ] around what I put because it was linking your talk page to that category page. I just wanted to add my comment. Again, thanks for the edits and I'm sorry about that. Cnota
The O.C. category
Since you closed this CFD with a keep, would you please use a bot to clean out all of the improperly categorized articles for cast and crew? Otto4711 20:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Can you let me know what your response to this request is, so if it's "no" I can try to find someone else to do it? Otto4711 19:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
NK War
why did you revert? have u even looked at the page, read it through? what was objectionable?
I'm not sure an indef is needed yet
In answer to your question you did correctly fix the pages however:
This user has committed page move vandalism in the past but his major issue is he moves professional wrestler articles to their current ring name without discussion. I think he's ding that in good faith out of ignorance of policy however his constant ignoring of warnings is worrisome.
"Antoni Polaski" is the current ring name of Michael Depoli which explains the moves, however the reason I requested another block is because he had previously moved this same page before and had been reverted for the same reasons. Personally I would think a block for a week, or maybe a month, should be enough for him to understand as I'm fairly sure it's ignorance not malice. –– Lid 09:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Block
Could you please block me? I'd like to see if I can go through Memorial Day weekend without editing. I'll probably just create a sock puppet, but it would be nice to see how long I can make it without doing so.
Usernames
Hey there, can I just ask why User:Meooooooooooow isn't a violation of username policy? It doesn't seem to tie in with the fact that User:Chickenssssssssssssssss and User:Ahhhhhhhh were both blocked earlier that day, and the policy does say "a lengthy or apparently random sequence of characters". Cheers, - Zeibura S. Kathau 13:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I'd have said it was a lengthy and random number of o's at the very least, I mean, I had to copy paste the username when I wrote you this comment.. but nevermind, it's no big deal per no contributions anyway, was just interested. Have a nice day! - Zeibura S. Kathau 14:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Bosco.png
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Bosco.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog) 17:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Ben Gatti
lol, sorry if I've been feeding the troll. I'll try to read up on the history a bit more. It looks pretty classic. theanphibian 05:45, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, so now we all have a Renewable Energy Bias. Lovely... theanphibian 06:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
GFDL on Image:VCRonaldNielStuart.jpg
Hi, Woohookitty. I noticed that you marked Image:VCRonaldNielStuart.jpg as GFDL in this edit. The image is currently used in an article that has been submitted to FAC. The image page does not contain any links to the source, so I cannot verify the copyright status. Did you find the image online when you applied the tag? If so, I'd appreciate it if you could add a link to the image page, or let me know where I can find it. Thanks, Pagrashtak 14:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. The discussion here might be helpful. Pagrashtak 23:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: Jordin Sparks image
Sorry, didn't get your message until just now. (With finals and things, haven't been logging on a lot.) Shall do my best to keep that thing off the article (in fact, had to remove it 5 seconds ago. -_-) MissMJ 01:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)