This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs) at 18:29, 30 May 2007 (→Blocked again, another COI violation: see WP:ANI#User:Giano_II ignoring WP:CONSENSUS). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:29, 30 May 2007 by BrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs) (→Blocked again, another COI violation: see WP:ANI#User:Giano_II ignoring WP:CONSENSUS)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Your block
I make no comment on the justification of your block. However, you may not be aware that it is possible to appeal against it. See details here Template:Unblock. When you are unblocked I am quite prepared to work with you and help you see the best way forward for your Arbuthnot pages. I understand this must be difficult for you but a solution does have to be found. Giano 08:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- To my mind the block was quite inappropriate. I have never seen a COI tag on an edit and although the cavalry officer shares my name he is incredibly distant and there is no COI at all. He is table I while I am Table L (see ). But I have no plans to appeal nor to use this account again. Because it has all become too personal and nothing is being done about the stalking and the incivility. I will return when MrDarcy returns. Do what you like with articles I have contributed to. I am not that fussed. - Kittybrewster (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Illegitimi non carborundum. I hope you return soon :-) Craigy (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I too. Unfortunate, to say the least, that you have been bullied to the extent you have. I am preparing something on all this which I propose to place before Jimbo Wales. David Lauder 17:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps the arbcom would be more appropriate? SqueakBox 20:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Kittybrewster. I too hope that you return soon. The actions of some editors towards you have been disgraceful. I find it hard to understand how you can stay so calm and polite despite this. Hopefully this will soon be over and you can focus on something constructive on Misplaced Pages again. Tryde 20:12, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I've replied to your email. Walton 13:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Blocked again, another COI violation
You have been blocked from editing for violating Misplaced Pages policy by (see explanation below). If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.
After this edit of another article on a person identified as a member of you family (in breach of WP:COI), I have imposed a further block on you. You have been repeatedly warned to observe WP:COI, and you will be aware that your failure to do so has been widely criticised at WP:ANI and elsewhere (see, for example WP:ANI#Vendetta): it is therefore a form of disruptive editing
Because this follows so soon after a previous block for the same problem, I have set this block with a duration of 7 days. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- How the hell is it CoI to edit an article on someone with one's surname, who died 150 years ago! --Counter-revolutionary 17:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Because Kittybewster regards this person as a member of his own family, about whom he has craeted dozens of articles on non-notable people, relying in most cases on sources owned by KB. See my reply to the discussion at WP:ANI#User:Giano_II ignoring WP:CONSENSUS. -BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)