Misplaced Pages

talk:Special:PrefixIndex - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Taemyr (talk | contribs) at 01:56, 9 July 2007 (Probably not, but anyway: reply.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:56, 9 July 2007 by Taemyr (talk | contribs) (Probably not, but anyway: reply.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for the special page at Special:PrefixIndex.
For general information on this and other special pages, see Help:Special page.
For recent talk about special pages, see Recentchangeslinked/Specialpages discussion

"no redirects" option

Is there an option to not include redirects? ∞ΣɛÞ² 20:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

I am not aware of such an option, but at least redirects are enclosed into <div class=allpagesredirect> (which already has italic CSS). So
div.allpagesredirect {display:none}
will hide them (leaving empty table cells unfortunately), while
div.allpagesredirect a {color:gray}
will simply make them easier to distinquish from normal pages. CSS code goes into your monobook.cssAlex Smotrov 19:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, but I was looking for a built-in MediaWiki option (that should be present anyway). Oh and I use simple.css. ;) ∞ΣɛÞ² 21:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


Probably not, but anyway

Is there any special page for suffixes? Such as to search for articles that end with (ice hockey) or something? I haven't found one, so I doubt there is, but I might as well ask. Bsroiaadn 13:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

No, there isn't. Maybe request it at WP:VPR or WP:VPT; it's a neat idea. This, that and the other 07:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Request a better search engine, too, since the current one sucks petunas, relying on external search engines (like Google) to pick up MediaWiki's slack. Misplaced Pages's navigation system sucks too, requiring dabs and categories to also pick up the slack. ∞ΣɛÞ² 19:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Don't reinvent the wheel. If google does the job there is no need for MediaWiki to do so. Also, your idea of what the dab pages are there for is plain wrong. As long as it's seen as a goal to be able to reach an article by typing the name directly dab pages will be necessary. No improvement in Wikipedias navigation system is going to change this, because the problem is in the ambiguity of the English language. Taemyr 01:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Category: