Misplaced Pages

White privilege

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.51.51.240 (talk) at 12:10, 28 May 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:10, 28 May 2005 by 68.51.51.240 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

White privilege, or White Skin Privilege, is a term of analysis -- employed by, among others, historians, legal scholars, philosophers, opponents of the Eugenics Movement and sociologists of racism -- that denotes a particular kind of social relation, one which typically involves a right, advantage, exemption or immunity granted to or enjoyed by white persons beyond the common advantage of nonwhites. It is the primary benefit of racism expressed as preferential treatment within a society. As racism is usually understood to be punitive towards people of color, white privilege is claimed to be the pattern of social benefits accruing to members of the socially privileged and oppressing group, at the expense of members of the socially disprivileged and oppressed group.

It explains such phenomena as white boxer, Gerry Cooney, receiving an very large amount of money for his 1982 fight with African American Larry Holmes, even though he was an untested contender. Examples from popular music include Elvis Presley, credited with popularizing "black music" with white audiences, as well as Eminem's popularity as a rap singer. It is also put forward by scholars as an explanation for why social groups have used racism as a form of social control and oppression: namely, to benefit themselves at the expense of others. It is also used by some historians to explain the historical trajectory from exclusion to acceptance of Irish and Jewish Americans.

Parallels are often drawn between white privilege, male privilege and heterosexual privilege. Advocates of white privilege theory may be sympathetic to black nationalism and other forms of ethnic nationalism and identity politics.

Critics of the concept of white privilege from the political left sometimes point out that the white skin privilege analysis undermines or ignores the class and economic nature of racism (i.e., that racism ultimately hurts every person, including whites), and that it runs the risk of branding all white people regardless of economic stature (including, presumably, working-class whites) or social or cultural history as "beneficiaries" of racism. Other critics claim not only that there is no such social relation as described by white privilege, but the very idea itself is nonsensical or absurd. The existence of a white under class is often cited as proof that there are no benefits necessarily accruing to white people as such.

Proponents of this concept maintain that white people are unaware of how their racial privilege operates on a daily basis. Thus they may consider themselves anti-racist but are not pro-actively conscious of what proponents of the concept claim are their own unfair advantages. Because it has a tendency to be invisible to the very people that profit from it, many argue that white privilege is a particularly insidious (and, to those who benefit from it, effective) form of social control to dismantle.

Whiteness studies is an emerging field of academic inquiry that emerges from the desire to address white privilege and to understand and dismantle it.

References

Categories: