This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FrozenPurpleCube (talk | contribs) at 07:29, 23 July 2007 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:29, 23 July 2007 by FrozenPurpleCube (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Solitaire Meissmer disappearance
- Solitaire Meissmer disappearance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
A not particularly remarkable case with two bad references: a memorial site and the family's website. User:Violetriga created this before being admonished by ArbCom for succumbing to tabloid journalism, which is what this article is. Guy (Help!) 07:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Hmm, I'm more than a bit disturbed by this nomination. It would have been much more appropriate to make it without referring to the individual editor's conduct. If you believe there's a problem with regards to an Arbitration decision, it would be far more appropriate to notify them instead of making it here. In any case gets a number of results including several reputable papers. And the guardian reference existed before your nomination, so I wonder how you missed it? Mister.Manticore 07:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)