This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Halibutt (talk | contribs) at 04:27, 13 June 2005 (→Black Book). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:27, 13 June 2005 by Halibutt (talk | contribs) (→Black Book)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Archives
- Archive I – User talk:Nohat/archive 2005-02-22
- Archive II – User talk:Nohat/archive 2005-06-12
Black Book
Nohat, why did you delete that page? Was it listed on vfd? It was a project page and I'm sure it should be there. Whether your remarks on Talk:Kiev are biased or not is another issue, but I believe that you should've at least consulted the author of that project before you deleted it. Please be so kind as to explain why was the page deleted. Halibutt 23:18, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Also, I decided to start that archive to avoid listing all of the users involved on RfC or any other page. I simply wanted to keep the things civil and canalized, without having to resort to all the painful dispute resolution process, accusations and so on. Your reaction was certainly not what I expected. Halibutt 23:21, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)
- A "Black Book" which exists solely to vilify users who you disagree with consistutes personal attacks. The page was deleted per Misplaced Pages:Remove personal attacks. If you have a problem with a user's behavior, the proper course of action is to list that user on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Compiling a list of users who have said things you disagree with, particularly if that list is not kept in user space, and demanding they apologize and rescind their comments in some kind of kangaroo court is totally unacceptable. The dispute resolution process exists for a reason, and creating an end-run around it is neither appropriate nor warranted. Nohat 23:25, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Nohat, please, calm down. Nobody has nothing against you and nobody is demanding anything from you. We're all friends here. Witkacy noted that that you assumed those who oppose you are nationalists, which in where I live is rather a serious offence. Personally I'm pretty sure you meant nothing wrong, but still, your remarks could be treated as biased.
- Anyway, do you really believe that starting an ArbCom or RfC every time someone assumes bad faith is a good idea? That's what I would call escalation of the conflict. And that's what we're trying to avoid. Of course, if you insist Witkacy could do that, but perhaps there is a way to make you cooperate? Halibutt 04:27, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)