This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yuber (talk | contribs) at 18:01, 13 June 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:01, 13 June 2005 by Yuber (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Zionist terrorism
I am electing to have this page deleted as it is just an epithet. It should be inserted into the political epithets page. Scarabar
If you're going to troll, at least sign it, man. Grace Note 03:57, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Neither an epithet nor does it have to be a bad article. Major revision is in progress. (also added the inital posters signature) LouieS June 11 2005
- Delete freestylefrappe 00:08, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC).
- Delete Curiosity 17:32, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Any reason?Grace Note 23:10, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Enviroknot 00:41, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable topic. Terroristic acts by Zionist militants during the pre-statehood era can only be termed Zionist, as that was the driving ideology; and, extremist forms of Zionism can also be seen as the ideology of post-statehood militants, in that sense. I am, however, open to persuasion which draws from the pertinent historiography (i.e. some sort of basis). In contradistinction from the post-statehood (hence, institutional, non/less clandestine) Israeli State terrorism. It is currently heatedly disputed by both sides, but this is to be expected. El_C 02:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Inherently a non-NPOV discussion; only purpose is to create a forum for indictment of Zionism; if necessary, can be merged into Irgun or Lehi (group) --LeFlyman 05:50, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. POV. Gamaliel 06:22, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- POV vote? I can't tell, it's limited to a single word. My argument is that the term is notable. See for example: John L. Peeke's (of the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School), Jewish-Zionist terrorism and the establishment of Israel (1977) El_C 06:31, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. No reason for deletion is offered. Proposer is 101% surely a sock. --Zero 07:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Strong keep - We have an article on Islamist terrorism and an article on Palestinian terrorism. Should they be deleted as POV forums for indictment of Islamism and Palestinians? --FCYTravis 07:28, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The difference between these articles, and those, is that Islamist Terrorism and Palestinian Terrorism are documented facts. The POV-pushing Islamists like BrandonYusufToropov and Zero keep trying to push nonsensical and racist accusations into this article, when the articles on particular non-supported groups which have not existed for decades (such as Irgun) cover all REAL incidents of so-called "zionist terrorism" just fine without the need for this redundant article. The sole purpose of the Keep votes here seems to be as a jumping-off point for racist attacks.
- Keep. --Silversmith Hewwo 09:21, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. BrandonYusufToropov 14:29, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- STRONG DELETE There can be no greater argument FOR deleting this article than that known Islamist vandals like BrandonYusufToropov and Zero are ardently trying to make sure that it exists so that they can use it as a platform to launch racist attacks against Jews.
- Delete There is a major difference between the Palestinian Terrorist article (which is not about the Palestinian Authority) and this article. If someone wants to write a historical article about events 60 years ago, they can -- start with the Irgun article. Until such time, this is pure POV. Mikeage 17:58, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Please disregard the votes by anonymous IPs of KaintheScion/Enviroknot.Yuber 18:01, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)