Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sapienz

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Orderinchaos (talk | contribs) at 06:25, 9 September 2007 (reblocked.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:25, 9 September 2007 by Orderinchaos (talk | contribs) (reblocked.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, Sapienz, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Gnangarra 13:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Misplaced Pages policy, by posting personal information of another user on a public Misplaced Pages page. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Orderinchaos 15:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

checkY

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

posting publicly available information about the IP address of a user who has made the choice to contribute with that IP address visible is not a violation of Misplaced Pages policy. you might notice the huge box below all IP user talk pages that has links to WHOIS lookup among other things (and that is where the "personal information" came from). ugen64 17:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Request handled by: ugen64 17:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

The ban has been reset on account of the failure of the reviewing admin to take the actual evidence into account. I have taken counsel from two other admins and have concluded that resetting this ban is the only suitable option, especially as your unblock request gave every indication that the harassment and false allegations would continue. As a good faith measure, I have reduced the block to 48 hours, but please note that further harassment of this nature in the future may see further action taken. Orderinchaos 06:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)