This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs) at 14:25, 10 September 2007 (recovering unwarranted deletion of vote and comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:25, 10 September 2007 by Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs) (recovering unwarranted deletion of vote and comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Kianna Dior
Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 14:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I disagree; she meets WP:PORNBIO. Xihr 20:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, right. How? Epbr123 20:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eh? You didn't say how she fails it. She's well-known in her niche (big-boobed Asians), has made plenty of movies, etc. Xihr 21:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Being "well-known" and making plenty of movies isn't in the WP:PORNBIO criteria. Epbr123 22:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Eh? You didn't say how she fails it. She's well-known in her niche (big-boobed Asians), has made plenty of movies, etc. Xihr 21:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability presented. Tabercil 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. She is really a famous porn star. UnknownMan 22:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fame doesn't equal notability. Epbr123 22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Vote and above reply recovered from unwarranted deletion by User:Picaroon. It is no one's place to remove other people's comments; the closing admin must take into consideration all votes. Higher quality votes with substance, of course, have more weight then non-quality votes, since AfD is not a vote. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. 14:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fame doesn't equal notability. Epbr123 22:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)