Misplaced Pages

Antiochus IV Epiphanes

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by YurikBot (talk | contribs) at 08:52, 15 July 2005 (robot Removing: no). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:52, 15 July 2005 by YurikBot (talk | contribs) (robot Removing: no)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Coin of Antiochus IV. Reverse shows Apollo seated on an omphalos. The Greek inscription reads ΑΝΤΙΟΧΟΥ ΘΕΟΥ ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥ ΝΙΚΗΦΟΡΟΥ (Antiochus, image of God, bearer of victory).

Antiochus IV Epiphanes (Επιφανής, Greek: "Glorious"), originally named Mithradates, but renamed Antiochus either upon his ascension or after the death of his elder brother Antiochus (c. 215163 BC, reigned 175163 BC), was one of the Seleucid emperors, son of Antiochus III the Great and brother of Seleucus IV Philopator.

Antiochus took power after the death of Seleucus Philopator. He had been hostage in Rome following the peace of Apamea in 188 BC but had recently been exchanged for the son and rightful heir of Seleucus IV, the later Demetrius I Soter. Taking advantage of this situation, Antiochus was able to proclaim himself as co-regent with another of Seleucus' sons, the infant Antiochus, whose murder he orchestrated a few years later.

Notable events during his reign include the near-conquest of Egypt, which was halted by the threat of Rome intervention, and the beginning of the Jewish revolt of the Maccabees. He was succeeded by his infant son, Antiochus V Eupator.

Because the guardians of Ptolemy VI of Egypt were demanding the return of Coele-Syria, Antiochus, in 170 BC decided on a preemptive strike and invaded Egypt, conquering all but Alexandria. He then captured Ptolemy agreed to let him continue as King but as his puppet. (This had the advantage of not alarming Rome.) Alexandria thereupon chose Ptolemy's brother Ptolemy Euergetes as King. In Antiochuses absence, the two brothers came to an agreement to rule jointly. Hence in 168 BC Antiochus again invaded and overran all Egypt but Alexandria while his fleet captured Cyprus. Near Alexandria he was met by a Roman envoy who told him that he must at once withdraw from Egypt and Cyprus. Antiochus said he would discuss it with his council, whereupon the envoy drew a line in the sand round him. Were he to step out of the circle, the envoy said, without having first undertaken to withdraw , he would be at war with Rome. Antiochus agreed to withdraw.

In a spirit of revenge he organized an expedition against Jerusalem, which he destroyed, as well as putting vast multitudes of its inhabitants to death in a most cruel manner. From this time the Jews began the war of independence under their Maccabean leaders with marked success, defeating the armies of Antiochus that were sent against them. Enraged at this, Antiochus is said to have marched against them in person, threatening utterly to exterminate the nation; but on the way he was suddenly arrested by the hand of death (164 BC). The exact causes of the Jewish revolt, and of Antiochus' response to it, are uncertain; The Jewish accounts are in The Books of The Maccabees, and the successful revolt commemorated in the Holiday of Hanuka. His last years were spent on a campaign against the rising Parthian empire, which seems to have been initially successful but which terminated upon his death.

The reign of Antiochus was a last period of strength for the empire, but in some way it was fatal; because he was an usurper and left no successor except a little boy, his death was followed by devastating dynastic wars.

Public Domain This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainEaston, Matthew George (1897). Easton's Bible Dictionary (New and revised ed.). T. Nelson and Sons. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

It is probable that Daniel 8:15-27 and 11:21-32 describe his career and character, where Antiochus is refered to as a "vile person", and for this reason these sections of Daniel are believed by some to have been written during the time of Antiochus, whereas, for the exact same reason, many Christians, Jews, Baha'i, and Biblical Unitarians accept these portions of the Book of Daniel to be exactly what they claim to be, divinely inspired prophecy.

Preceded by:
Seleucus IV
Seleucid Ruler Succeeded by:
Antiochus V

External link

Categories: