Misplaced Pages

User talk:Obedium

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Animum (talk | contribs) at 01:24, 26 September 2007 (→September 2007: Nah). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:24, 26 September 2007 by Animum (talk | contribs) (→September 2007: Nah)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, Obedium, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 22:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:3RR on James Hansen

Hi Obedium. You have now repeatedly violated WP:3R (not to say WP:V) by adding various unsourced and misleading versions of the "Hansen predicted cooling" meme. Please stop this. Violation of WP:3RR can get you blocked. Please review that policy. --Stephan Schulz 02:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at James Hansen. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — madman bum and angel 02:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Obedium (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have included factual data, which some users simply do not like and keep deleting. Trying to reinstate facts does not constiute a 3RR violation. Several users simply ganging up and constantly reverting factual edits is what should be considered a violations. Remove this block now!

Decline reason:

Discuss instead of reverting. —] 01:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.