This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WJBscribe (talk | contribs) at 04:17, 3 October 2007 (rv - I'm unaware of any prohibition on the use of such images). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:17, 3 October 2007 by WJBscribe (talk | contribs) (rv - I'm unaware of any prohibition on the use of such images)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) File:Animalibrí.gif
Caught between languagesI recently finished writing a biography of Sebastien Rale, an early Maine Jesuit priest, but due to pre-existing French accentuation in his page's title (you know, those funny little marks over certain letters), nobody without the accentuation on their keyboard (i. e. Americans) can access it. See? Even here the name appears in red, as if his page didn't exist. Would you or somebody else please arrange it so that typing Sebastien Rale, in addition to Sebastian Rasle (a common alternate spelling) is directed to his page? I would be ever so grateful. Thank you.--Hugh Manatee 18:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
RickK?who was RickK and why did he leave? --MKnight9989 13:26, 7 September 2007 (UTC) ZoosI disagree with the stance that PETA is a valid source for information regarding zoos. That's like saying that McDonald's Corporation is a good source for an article called "Beef: Is it Tasty?" That aside, I'm very concerned with the article about zoos. I feel that it should be entirely factual with no boasting or criticism from either side. Other people don't feel this way, apparently. It makes me very sad to see that Misplaced Pages is slipping into the hands of partisans and opinion-peddlers. I don't know how to go about my goal of neutralizing the article without all the hippies, PETAphiles, etc. feeling like I've marginalized them. Thoughts? Suggestions? I mean... I'm not a champion of zoos or anything, I just think that the article should be about things like "what is a zoo?" "where are zoos located?" "when was the first zoo established" instead of things like "zoos are great because they display man's domination of the animals" or "zoos suck because Paul McCartney says so!" I'm just so frustrated... sorry for writing such a long rant. Pygmypony 23:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC) wikiproject biographyI saw your name on wikiproject biography. If you have any advice to improve the article to prevent Lansing Bennett from deletion, let me know. Thanks. Mrs.EasterBunny 18:24, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 45,000 editsCongratulations on an impressive milestone. LaraLove♥ 13:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Request for mediationA request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:No original research, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Misplaced Pages, please refer to Misplaced Pages:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation.
You are missedWhere are you, SlimVirgin? I hope that you won't let bastards grind you down. Your intelligent presence and contributions are very much missed in Misplaced Pages. All the best, Ghirla 20:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC) I second that...hope all is well with you!--MONGO 21:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
User has run out of warnings, continues to vanadlise.Hi Slim, The user Craig48 has had his "final warning", and perpetrated the following: I guess it's time for a temporary block? --Slashme 07:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Request for Mediation
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly. Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/RonnotelPlease take a serious look at the above. Thanks. Smallbones 14:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Misplaced Pages:AttributionI agree that this page is not historical, but please refrain from ticking the "minor edit" checkbox when performing edits of this nature. Keep in mind that "a minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." "If you think there is any chance that another editor might dispute your change, please, do not mark it as minor." Their vs. theirAn editor is attempting to address the Their vs. their issue in the named article On the Jews and Their Lies. You appear to have dealt with this. See this post. I can't figure out what is going on. Ludvikus blanked On the Jews and their Lies and listed it for speedy deletion. I posted a page blanking warning on his talk page, received a message on my talk page, and now am here. Please look into whether On the Jews and their Lies (small "t" on "their") is the correct name of the article or whether On the Jews and Their Lies (big "T" on "Their") is the correct name of the article. Thanks. -- Jreferee T/C 18:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC) On the Jews and their Lies vs. On the Jews and Their LiesHow are you? Are you still Slim? Are you still a ... just kidding!
Sockpuppet flagI mean to add the sockpuppet flag, chiefly with reference to what you have done as the puppeteer of User:Sweet Blue Water (blocked as your abusive sockpuppet here), on your User page. It was under protection, so I've put it at the top of this page on the understanding that you're able to transfer it to there, as is appropriate. From AboveTheClub 11:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Need assistancePlease see this and respond. - Penwhale | 08:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Brent Corrigan... has been calm for a month now, and the article itself is not protected. Any objection to unprotecting the talk page? Will also ask User:Xaosflux. --AnonEMouse 14:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Howdy!I believe you were going to contact me regarding the "anonymous admining" policy? GofG || Talk 21:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC) re: An apologyThanks Slim, I've replied on my talk page. Paul August ☎ 21:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC) Welcome back... Nice to see you around again. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
NORHi. We don't know each other and I don't think any of our edits have ever crossed paths. However, myself and others are engaged in some discussions over at WT:NOR. Looking through the past archives, I saw that you had a similar opinion back in January 2005, as many currently seem to have. I'm not sure if you would want to re-enter the debates or not, but I thought I'd ask for your participation. You seem to be a well-respected editor here, so your opinions either way may help in the on-going discussions. If you would prefer not to participate, I can understand that as well. I have been involved in this for over a month myself, and at times I really feel like calling it quits. Thanks for your consideration. wbfergus 16:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
WP:CITE and WP:FNI imagine you are busy with other things, but are you still following this about ref tag placement? Is it worth dealing with? Your presence is missed. Gimmetrow 02:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC) Replaceable fair use Image:RobertaKalechofsky.jpgThanks for uploading Image:RobertaKalechofsky.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot 18:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC) Replaceable fair use Image:NathanShaham.jpgThanks for uploading Image:NathanShaham.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot 03:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC) Replaceable fair use Image:Rubinstein.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Rubinstein.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot 04:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC) Replaceable fair use Image:SimonArmitage.jpgThanks for uploading Image:SimonArmitage.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot 04:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC) |