This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kappa (talk | contribs) at 14:15, 9 October 2007 (→Sierra Vista Mall: stupid). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:15, 9 October 2007 by Kappa (talk | contribs) (→Sierra Vista Mall: stupid)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Sierra Vista Mall
- Sierra Vista Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable mall in California. A search turns up no reliable sources to verify most of the page's content. Borderline spam. Ten Pound Hammer • 17:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I think that's enough to be considered spam. NASCAR Fan24 18:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- comment Note that this AfD was created over the previous one which was closed as no consensus. See . JoshuaZ 18:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & nascar fan. ~ | twsx | cont | 18:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N. BASE101() 18:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per spam. -- Magioladitis 01:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete can someone explain to why malls are listed on wikipedia at all?Ridernyc 17:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep notability is derived from economic impact - Citations and infobox added Exit2DOS2000 01:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- A community development 3-page glossy brochure is hardly a reliable proof of notable economic impact, is it?--Victor falk 08:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I also want to know the answer to Ridernyc's question. --Victor falk 03:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, passes WP:N with a great deal of press coverage of the topic throughout its history. , even the cinema opening Kappa 03:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- If this is going be deleted as "spam" we can just make a new version anyway. Kappa 03:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. — pd_THOR | 08:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Don't be stupid. Kappa 14:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)