Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Exit2DOS2000 (talk | contribs) at 23:47, 9 October 2007 (→Sierra Vista Mall: awnser a question + ask someone to be CIVIL). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sierra Vista Mall

Sierra Vista Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable mall in California. A search turns up no reliable sources to verify most of the page's content. Borderline spam. Ten Pound Hammer • 17:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I think that's enough to be considered spam. NASCAR Fan24 18:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• comment Note that this AfD was created over the previous one which was closed as no consensus. See . JoshuaZ 18:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom & nascar fan. ~ | twsx | _cont | 18:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N. BASE101() 18:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per spam. -- Magioladitis 01:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete can someone explain to why malls are listed on wikipedia at all?Ridernyc 17:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep notability is derived from economic impact - Citations and infobox added Exit2DOS2000 01:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• A community development 3-page glossy brochure is hardly a reliable proof of notable economic impact, is it?--Victor falk 08:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it is. as long as it is produced by other than the shopping centre itself. May I ask why you do not believe it satisfies WP:RS? Exit2DOS2000 23:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I also want to know the answer to Ridernyc's question. --Victor falk 03:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

To awnser your and Ridernyc question; I have always contended, Shopping centres are notable for their Economic Impact to the local community. notabilaty guidelines (yes, admittedly only a guidline) mention having effect on an economy is enough to give notability, and in my view, especially in smaller communities, a shopping centres effect is staggering. When they are constructed, during their lifecycle, even in its death throws, it is still having an effect upon the community. After the place has met the wrecking ball, I would still contend it deserves an Article because they had a staggering economic effect upon the local community. Exit2DOS2000 23:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, passes WP:N with a great deal of press coverage of the topic throughout its history. , even the cinema opening Kappa 03:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
  • If this is going be deleted as "spam" we can just make a new version anyway. Kappa 03:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. — pd_THOR | 08:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Don't be stupid. Kappa 14:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

ahem, please be civil Exit2DOS2000 23:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Keep - these articles are important, and notability is inherent.139.48.81.98 15:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• AfD debates (Places and transportation)
• AfD debates