Misplaced Pages

User talk:Perspicacite

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Alice (talk | contribs) at 03:08, 12 November 2007 (since you seem a little schizophrenic about publicity). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:08, 12 November 2007 by Alice (talk | contribs) (since you seem a little schizophrenic about publicity)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archive

My grandstanding; pros and cons

(copied from http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Perspicacite/Archive&oldid=170858006#My_grandstanding.3B_pros_and_cons)

I dunno... I guess I can see your point here, but I rather enjoy grandstanding. One thing that still remains unclear to me though is why you felt a need to delete Penwhale's comment, which expressed a rather high level of annoyance with my posts. Perspicacite 12:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I like my spade. What are you doing with Alice.S??? Dont you go giving her ideas! I finally found someone so obsessed with me they feel a need to create an identical, duplicate copy of my archive. I love it. Perspicacite 12:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages is not MySpace. The encyclopaedia is thataway → Guy (Help!) 12:33, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Pssh first you take my spade and now you want my haters. Will nothing satisfy you?!? Perspicacite 12:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
No. I am an evil rouge admin. I thought this was common knowledge? Guy (Help!) 12:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Points of information:

  1. I am becoming a bit obsessed with protecting our project from those who are not simple vandals but misuse their intelligence and education to drive away and corrupt good contributions - if that doesn't sound too pompous.
  2. As of now, my user space page, is not an "identical, duplicate copy of (your) archive". It currently has 101 sections (not including this one - which never appeared on your talk page, and it also excludes the four opening sections {which are not relevant to your original allegations of Wikistalking}) whereas your own (mysteriously?) only has 95 (again, excluding this one). Additionally, there will always be a certain time lag.
  3. My fond hope is that, when your civility improves and your destructive reverts and edit warring ceases, we will be able to forgo sanctions and ArbComs and the like and I can stop maintaining it as possible future evidence and concentrate on improving articles.

While I am here, may I formally ask you to move this whole sub-section to your talk page (and then, perhaps, delete it) so that I can add it to my "imperfect mirror"?

PS: I must say that you both give every indication of being better sports than I imagined "heavyweight class" Wikipedians would be.Alice.S 00:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)