Misplaced Pages

Welcome to my talk page

User:Allstarecho/talkheader

Userbox

east.718 at 23:05, November 20, 2007

Choose your battles

Lordy, Allstar, that Larry Craig dispute is even pettier than the Icelandic rockstar dispute that got me blocked today. Describe is implied in allege. I'd let this one go, if I were you, and concentrate on making sure the actual content doesn't get removed. just my advice, still stinging from my unjustified block. Jeffpw 18:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Your insistence on reverting to a previous version of the bear community page is facile. I have more ip addresses than you can poke a stick at — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.155.196.3 (talk) 06:42, 3 December 2007 UTC (UTC)

I also object to your heading. It is offensive to the disabled. Please remove it or I will report you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.155.196.3 (talk) 06:43, 3 December 2007 UTC (UTC)

Whitelisting

Is done - cheers --Herby 14:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! -- ALLSTARecho 16:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Man, you're on top of it!

Thanks for the heads up; it's editors like you who help keep us absent-minded admins in check. ;) Jmlk17 17:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the shit & giggles

I didn't know whether to be pissed off or laugh, until you made that last remark. Now I'm just gonna laugh. 14 hour shift today, braindead, and after the drama with my insane adoptee (and that malignant block, yesterday) I needed some smiles on my page. Thanks. Jeffpw 23:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

No thanks

Please don't ever edit my comments again in the manner in which you did here. There are a number of reasons why I don't bold the oppose, and it is common courtesy that others don't change it. I'd suggest you honour this courtesy to others, as well. Thanks, Daniel 23:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

My apologies. I did it for clarity and ease of counting the RFA votes. -- ALLSTARecho 01:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

And now that I look at the comment you left with your revert, "Don't ever do that again with one of my comments, thanks", I'd just like to say you don't have to be a dick about it either! -- ALLSTARecho 01:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

To be fair, making assumptions about what someone intended on doing with their post could be seen as somewhat of a dick-move in and of itself... however, arguing over that will just exacerbate the situation. Suffice it to say, editing something that someone else said is generally a bad idea. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

your reverts

Discontinue your reverts here, per WP:NFCC, which states that non-free images may not be used outside of mainspace. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Further, your continued misuse of TWINKLE may result in the loss of your privilege to use it. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Twinkle has nothing to do with this as I could just as easily revert without Twinkle. However, my apologies for the reverts since the image was a photograph that someone took and uploaded to WP. The rationale says specifically, "I release this photograph under the GFDL". Thanks. -- ALLSTARecho 01:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks so much!

For my new shiny and fruity barnstar! Yay! What a neat project LGBT Studies is. --Moni3 01:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Sig code

I happened across a talk page you signed, and noticed that your signature could be condensed a bit.

Here's your current sig (245 characters):

ALLSTARecho

]]

Here's the revised version (227 characters):

ALLSTARecho

]]

Feel free to ignore the new code if you don't feel like changing; I was just bored and thought I'd try to be helpful. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. It's implemented! -- ALLSTARecho 06:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Alabama communities

I like the NPA header at the top :-)

As far as the Alabama communities: there is generally no possible way to source the population for an unincorporated area definitively if the Census doesn't make it a CDP. Of course, with communities such as Madden, it's different because of the newspaper source, but most communities have no sources at all dealing with this, and it's likely that most communities like this have the population put up by a local resident. Moreover, when I'm placing county templates such as the one for Leake County, I'm just going through communities rapidly, and I don't have time to go researching: if someone like you wishes to spend more time to research it, that's good, but there's no reason for an unsourced and likely unsourceable statement to remain posted. Nyttend 19:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. :)

Mississippi ;) and maybe we could find a bot to handle the task of building a list of unsourced population articles? -- ALLSTARecho 00:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Ole' Miss

You might want to take a look at my comments on the talk page. I encourage you and the other editor to work together on the wording. Honestly, I think the section should stay and be reworded if necessary. Whatever you guys decide, I hope you'll stop the reverting. It gets disruptive and really is not helpful. Davidpdx (talk) 04:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Mississippi - levee building

Thanks for keeping the sourced material on levee building. You challenged me to learn more and I did. I have more sourced info to add - more African Americans and others worked on the levees AFTER the war, when they were wage laborers. Interestingly, there were hundreds/thousands of transient workers in the Mississippi Delta in the late 19th c.- both those who worked on levees and those who were there as sawyers. Transient workers were at the highest risk of lynching. (John C. Willis, Forgotten Time: The Yazoo-Mississippi Delta after the Civil War, 2000)--Parkwells (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

You're doing very well on Mississippi and I appreciate your efforts and hard work. -- ALLSTARecho 03:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

my talk page

Please stop putting lies on my talk page. I didn't "deliberately introduce incorrect information." Everything I said was referenced, but you conveniently deleted that. There are several sites reporting definitively that Petrino is the new head coach and the press conference is to introduce him. I do not appreciate the unwarranted attacks. Enigmaman (talk) 03:08, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Just FYI, I don't think that Enigmaman was deliberately introducing incorrect information, rather, I think it was an edit war. {{uw-3rr}} probably would have been a better warning. Kesac (talk) 03:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. However, check his talk page history. I did a 3RR warning and he removed it. After continuing to add the information, I then gave the deliberate factual error warning which was the case considering he didn't stop after the 3RR warning. -- ALLSTARecho 03:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, yeah, I see. Kesac (talk) 03:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

It was all factual and your accusations were, and still are, baseless. I never deliberately introduced incorrect information because all the information I added was correct. Your continued attacks are not appreciated. Enigmaman (talk) 08:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:Bobby Petrino

The news conference is currently occuring. Kesac (talk) 04:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

ESPN reports it to take place at 11:30. Again, until a media source reports that he is officially hired, it doesn't belong in the article as it's inaccurate information and that's now allowed per WikiPedia policy. -- ALLSTARecho 04:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

11:30 EST, 10:30 CST. Kesac (talk) 04:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Ref: Kesac (talk) 04:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Gotcha. Thanks! :) -- ALLSTARecho 04:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

LGBT Quote

I think you put in the John Stewart quote...if so, can you make the link go to the specific person who it came from? I would think it came from The Daily Show, in which case it would be Jon Stewart with no "H" Ctjf83 01:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for catching that. I fixed it. -- ALLSTARecho 01:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)