This is an old revision of this page, as edited by B (talk | contribs) at 14:57, 14 December 2007 (→Image:LennonNYC.jpg: ++comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:57, 14 December 2007 by B (talk | contribs) (→Image:LennonNYC.jpg: ++comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
| < December 13 | December 15 > |
|---|
December 14
Image:Meshuggah Band.jpg
Web source provides no true image origin or terms for usage. No permissions for use granted. 156.34.142.110 (talk) 14:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:OUR HD-Users-kamardelosreyes-Desktop-Imdb shot.jpg
This may be me being paranoid, but this is a professional-quality photo taken by a user who started an account, uploaded this, then did nothing else. It also has IMDB in the filename and looks like a publicity shot. (But it's high-enough-res it's not like most things pulled from the internet.) The file name has the name of a male soap opera actor, so I don't know who this person is to try googling and looking for similar images. Can anyone ID the subject of the photo? Mangostar (talk) 00:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Regardless of whether or not it's free, you may just want to take it to IFD. If we don't know who this person is, it isn't a very useful photo. --B (talk) 01:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Somali Askari..jpg
Does not look like a user-authored image - it appears to be a scan of an old photo/book B (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:AbshirNPF.jpg
Photo comes from a UC Berkeley website and the copyright owner is not attributed on the source website. There is no reason to believe it is a US federal government photo. B (talk) 01:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Cityofsomerset.jpg
Obviously not a user-authored image B (talk) 02:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Createimage.jpeg
Image appears on the city's website in the bottom right corner - http://www.cityofsomerset.com/ --B (talk) 02:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:LtGovOfficialPhotoWeb.jpg
Official state portrait of Kentucky's Lt Governor - no reason to believe the CC license applies B (talk) 02:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:L c3d386a8c4794a44aabcc4c08dc14782.jpg
Unlikely a user-authored image. From the filename, this came off of somebody's myspace page. B (talk) 02:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Napoleon A. Tuiteleleapaga in the early 1950's.jpg
Obviously scanned from a newspaper, description says it is from the early 1950s, so probably not PD. It's tagged as GFDL-self, which is definitely false. B (talk) 02:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Redeemer3.jpg
obviously non-free - an image from a comic book B (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:2cvugo.jpg
First claimed PD-self then claimed copyrighted by uploader. PD-ineligible? Jusjih (talk) 03:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'm going out on a limb and assuming it's supposed to be something other than a black box. It's probably a corrupt image ... but whatever it is supposed to be, the terms given on the description page are incompatible. --B (talk) 03:21, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Network_map.gif
From http://www.highways.gov.uk/aboutus/139.aspx, the GFDL-self claim is questionable. Jusjih (talk) 03:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Kamelia-MyWork-big.jpg
Uploader claimed self licensing. IP blanked it. Need comments to determine if the self licensing is credible. Jusjih (talk) 03:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Enkinintu.JPG
No reason to believe it is PD B (talk) 05:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Screwtopvessel.jpg
No reason to believe the image is PD. There is a false claim on the description page that the image is PD because the lighting isn't creative, but this is a photo of a 3D object, which is inherently creative. B (talk) 05:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Basalflangeturtlebird.jpg
No reason to believe the image is PD. A photo of a 3D object is inherently creative and thus subject to copyright. B (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Codexplate.jpg
No reason to believe the image is PD. A photo of a 3D object is inherently creative and thus subject to copyright. B (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Codexshaman.jpg
No reason to believe the image is PD. A photo of a 3D object is inherently creative and thus subject to copyright. B (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Incisedserpant.jpg
No reason to believe the image is PD. A photo of a 3D object is inherently creative and thus subject to copyright. B (talk) 05:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Trimamimfrom.jpg
No reason to believe the image is PD. A photo of a 3D object is inherently creative and thus subject to copyright. B (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Regional-Chochola.jpg
No reason to believe the image is PD. A photo of a 3D object is inherently creative and thus subject to copyright. B (talk) 05:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Argentina.FdoDelaRua.01.jpg
Terms of use given on description page forbid commercial reuse - "Users may download, copy and reprint information from the site for non-commercial purposes ..." B (talk) 05:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:OAS.MainBuilding.WashDC.01.jpg
Source website terms of service forbid commercial use and derivative works. B (talk) 05:37, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Paraguay.NicanorDuarte.01.jpg
Source website terms of service forbid commercial reuse and derivative works B (talk) 05:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:L f7fa59d05a91d9d115551040a3148738.gif
This image rotates between logos of various sports teams. Those logos are copyrighted and/or trademarked, meaning this image cannot be considered to be free. B (talk) 05:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:L ff2d82419c09271474d727cbab3a0b39.jpg
Image sourced to band's myspace page - no reason to believe it is free B (talk) 06:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:LennonNYC.jpg
Permission claimed, but no OTRS ticket. Someone check the OTRS queues, if nothing found, delete; if found and ok, add the ticket number. Lupo 09:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Don't know, but if the terms of use exclude moving it to Commons, that's not a free image regardless of what OTRS finds. --B (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Dharmendra.jpg
Uploader claims this is public domain in India because the image was published at least 60 years ago. This Dharmendra was born in 1935. Does he look like he's 12 in this image to you? Highly, highly doubtful. --Durin (talk) 14:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
