Misplaced Pages

Talk:Winchell's Donuts

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Oxymoron83 (talk | contribs) at 16:16, 20 December 2007 (Reverted edits by 198.111.237.9 (talk) to last version by Warfreak). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:16, 20 December 2007 by Oxymoron83 (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 198.111.237.9 (talk) to last version by Warfreak)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconFood and drink Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
WikiProject iconBusiness Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Massive cuts

I know that was a bold edit, but it had to be done. It did indeed read like an advertising page. More than that, some of the text appeared to have been simply cut and pasted from their website with minimal rearrangement, which is a copyright violation. This text clearly had to go.

I think at this point the article is in a place where it can be expanded into a useful one. TCC (talk) (contribs) 21:08, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Categories: