Misplaced Pages

User talk:Coredesat

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lawrence Cohen (talk | contribs) at 02:05, 6 January 2008 (→Matt Sanchez: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:05, 6 January 2008 by Lawrence Cohen (talk | contribs) (→Matt Sanchez: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for leaving messages for User:Coredesat.

  • Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them a descriptive header. I will usually reply on your talk page unless there's a need for me to reply here.

Talk page guidelines

Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil.

My user talk archives
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8
9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16
WPTC Newsletters

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 52 26 December 2007 About the Signpost
Wales appoints six arbitrators Board approves expansion, up to 11 trustees possible 
WikiWorld comic: "Molasses" News and notes: Stewards, Senate testimony, milestones 
Misplaced Pages in the News WikiProject Report: Plants 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Dear Coredesat, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind support on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (72/19/6).

Now that I am a sysop, do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.

Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — E 12:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

WikBack

Thanks for registering at the WikBack. I look forward to your posts. If someone other than you registered in your name (or if you have no idea what this is about), please let me know immediately as it may be an imposter. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 01:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your support in my successful RFA. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 07:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Inactive WPTC users

Just to let you know, since you did not respond to the previous message, your status within the Tropical cyclone Wikiproject has been transferred to inactive. However, it merely looks like you're away, so when you come back, I hope you change your status back to active. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back

Hey, its Mitch. I hope you can come back to the tc wikiproject soon. Its not the same without you.32 12:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Strawberry Flower

Eh, I got to look more carefully next time, but I've restored the page and its fine now. Thanks for catching that.32 14:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Matt Sanchez

I've been trying to keep tabs on the problems associated with this user and article for some time. The indefblock seems disproportionate. There seem for some reason to be many separate ANI threads on the subjects. Could you catch me up on how this situation has escalated so fast from my recent 48 hour block? WjBscribe 00:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Given the ridiculous provocation caused by the addition of this section to his biography and edit warring over said content, I propose do reduce Matt Sanchez's block to one week. Do you object? WjBscribe 02:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Would you mind raising this on ANI instead of here, and hashing it out in a wider forum? I brought up the topic there myself after I saw all the homophobic comments he had been peppering for months, such as the ones detailed on the RFC. I asked for the indef block due to that ongoing incivility. I agree he may have been partially baited, or at least provoked in some sense, but attacking people that are gay, or insisting gays not edit his article, is unacceptable. Lawrence Cohen 02:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)