Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine/Proposed decision - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration | Bluemarine

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SirFozzie (talk | contribs) at 05:38, 19 January 2008 (Request for guidance). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 05:38, 19 January 2008 by SirFozzie (talk | contribs) (Request for guidance)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Arbitrators active on this case

To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try purging the cache.

Request for guidance

I recently closed the 3rd AfD debate for this article, Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Matt Sanchez (3rd nomination) Per that, the consensus of the decision was both to keep the article, but alleviate BLP concerns, by taking a hard look at the sources involved, and make sure the article complies with WP:BLP. When I attempted to do this (full admission, the article is fully protected), I was convinced to self-revert, as I was told that this fell under the perview of the ArbCom. Can ArbCom please provide guidance on how best to implement the AfD consensus? Thank you. SirFozzie (talk) 05:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)