This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Herostratus (talk | contribs) at 04:17, 18 January 2008 (forgot page name). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:17, 18 January 2008 by Herostratus (talk | contribs) (forgot page name)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User:VigilancePrime/ACS
Sheesh, where to begin. This destructive and inappropriate userpage may seem benign at first glance, but isn't. That it's in effect a private project is bad enough (see "the rules" at the top of the talk page - "Since this is my userspace, we use my rules. Don't like it? Use your own userspace. Invited editors, please." Indeed.) Worse, the raison d'etre of the undertaking is to protect and defend the inappropriate article Adult-child sex, a fork of Child sexual abuse. "Child sexual abuse", you see, notwithstanding that it's the clinical and universal term, is too judgmental and we need a article neutral in title and content. We don't want to imply that adult-child sex is somehow "wrong", you see. Anyway, there's lots more background here; I'd recommend you read it before commenting. At least let these people do their Misplaced Pages-subversive plotting on the their own bandwidth. NOTE TO CLOSING ADMIN: as you will see, these people are clever, numerous, determined, and well versed in Wiki terminology, policies, and argumentation. I request that you ignore numbers and focus on the overall good of the Misplaced Pages and whether this page enhances or detracts from that Herostratus (talk) 04:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)