Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wiki Raja

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by White2020 (talk | contribs) at 12:50, 24 January 2008 (→February 2008 collaboration: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:50, 24 January 2008 by White2020 (talk | contribs) (→February 2008 collaboration: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Please click here to leave me a new message.


I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REMOVE COMMENTARY THAT I DEEM OFFENSIVE


Archive
Archive

Gloriosa Lily

Archives  

Impressive Work

I've been observing for quite sometime. You have been doing extremely impressive work in Misplaced Pages. Your userpage is highly informative. I'm extremely sorry for not joining your project. I personally dont feel the name 'Dravidian civilizations' or 'Dravidian people' is right. Instead something like 'Tamil civilization' could be used. Anyway, thankx. Bye. tc.-Ravichandar 03:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Actually Wikiproject Dravidian civilizations was chosen to promote Tamil, Telugu, Malayalee, and other similar groups. Thus, Dravidian civilizations is a family of related ethnicities and languages in South Asia. There is not much info on these groups as compared to the information covered on Indo-Aryan civilizations. There is a lot of work to be done, which is being done. Furthermore, Wikiproject Dravidian civilizations can be used as a platform to create other Wikiprojects focussing on a particular civilization such as that of the Tamils, or Telugus, or Brahuis, and so forth. Therefore, I will consider the idea for a Wikiproject Tamil civilization. Please let me know if you are interested. Regards. Wiki Raja (talk)

SLR agreement

As a signatory of this agreement, you may be interested that we're currently discussing the WT:SLR#Continuation of SLR agreement. This is just a courtesy notice. — Sebastian 05:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding reversions made on January 24 2008 to Talk:Bharatanatyam

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. The duration of the block is 2 weeks. Nishkid64 (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The duration was set for 2 weeks because this is not the first time you have engaged in disruptive edit warring over the same project templates on user talk pages. If you recall, I issued a 72 hour block for the same type of editing back in September 2007. Nishkid64 (talk) 07:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008 collaboration

Again, we need more votes for our February collaboration. Please do exercise your right to vote! White2020 (talk) 12:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)