Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 14:09, 3 February 2008 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 72h) to User talk:Styrofoam1994/Archive 8.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

archive 3. archive 4. 5th. 6th. 7th.

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Shout out at my talk page

LOL Yes I am indeed Korean. And I also support Barack Obama for '08! You are welcome to contribute actually. I didn't have time to find any reliable sources to start the article. But uhh.. did you really come from North Korea? миражinred (speak, my child...) 21:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Nice. What article are you talking about? Also I am from South Korea. STYROFOAM☭1994 21:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I thought you were from North Korea because of your usebox. The article I was referring to was the Jeam-ri Massacre. (제암리학살) If you are a history buff, that would be nice. миражinred (speak, my child...) 21:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I learned a little about it in 6th grade. STYROFOAM☭1994 22:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Durzatwink

What's going on here? I'm assuming a good faith practical joke here, but to the observer it looks a little strange... If it is a joke, please consider sticking a speedy tag on it? It might not be looked on so kindly by other editors. Thanks! haz (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

It is not a joke; it is a real sockpuppet report. STYROFOAM☭1994 23:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay... this is absolutely odd.--DurzaTwink (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I have deleted it as a testpage - fake warning on your friends talkpage as part of your "training" can be overlooked, but please do not misuse project space for games. Misplaced Pages is not really for social networking, but for building an encyclopedia. Thanks Agathoclea (talk)

It wasn't a game. Seriously. Did you even check if I was right? STYROFOAM☭1994 00:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I have left a message with the admin who closed your previous sockpuppet report. He might recreate if he feels like you. Agathoclea (talk) 00:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for your notifications.

STYROFOAM☭1994 01:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

See my response on the AN page. Styro, as for you, if you make more personal attacks or do something like impersonate an admin, I'll block you myself. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Notice

Recently, you have deleted half of my talk page for no apprent reason. Please refrain from deleting parts of talk pages without any rationales stated in the edit summary. Best regards :)--DurzaTwink (talk) 00:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I was removing the simulated crisis message because we finished it. STYROFOAM☭1994 01:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Why are you reverting my edits then do the exact same thing i did? pick up the phone--DurzaTwink (talk) 21:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

You undid it so that the article didn't cite any references. See the article again and look at the improvements in citations. Also, what you just posted above is irrelevant to the Notice, and you should make a new header at the bottom of the page. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 21:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

It is relevent to notice. Also, i did that before but there were those "tedious" minor edits made by vandalizers which made it hard to fix. That why I need rollback--DurzaTwink (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I undoed it first but you messed it up--DurzaTwink (talk) 21:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, you removed all the references and wikification and said "my bad it shouldn't have been undone" here, and my restoration here, you don't seem qualified for rollback rights. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 22:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes I do, I was obviously too busy to work on that page because I was busy working on my super fantasic project now LET ME CALL YOU PLEASE for I shall be civil and need to communicate in a quicker way. --DurzaTwink (talk) 22:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)22:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

If you were busy, why did you revert your reversion so it looked bad again? Also, I was so annoyed about your calling that my dad made it so that all of your calls are automatically redirected the voicemail. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 22:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

I have approved your request for rollback. Now use the tool wisely. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, and I will use it wisely. STYROFOAM☭1994 15:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I see that you used rollback here to revert another user's good faith edits. Just so you know, Rollback is only to be used to revert vandalism only. Please take this into consideration next time you go to use rollback. Malinaccier (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I reverted that later. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 23:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

If you wanted to test, then you should have used the sandbox, or found a vandal and reverted their edits. On further examination, I found that you reverted another good faith edit earlier, though you did undo your own edit later. Seeing the comment "I have been awarded rollback" on your userpage also gave me reason to worry. You need to understand that having rollback rights is no more important than installing Twinkle for use in your monobook.js. Rollback is a tool, and not a toy. Please be extremely careful with Rollback in the future, as it can do some serious damage to Misplaced Pages. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 23:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC).

I thought I did that before getting rollback. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 23:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

It was clearly after you recieved rollback. It was even after you created the rollback userbox. Malinaccier (talk) 23:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

OK. I'll use rollback only for clear vandalism now. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 23:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you please use ur rollback to restore everything back to user:Mauls in the article Action? Thanks--DurzaTwink (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm already trying but I keep getting edit conflicts _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 02:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you know why it says I cant revert it back? it says that there are too many intermediate edits--02:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

That was very stimulating!! being a recent changes patroller and anti vandalism guy is fun!--DurzaTwink (talk) 02:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Your Name

For your information, your contributions on your name does not work. Sincerely--DurzaTwink (talk) 03:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Of course it works. Why do you ask? _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 03:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

When i clicked on it yoour user page was user:user:Styrofoam1994 . You put an extra user by mistake lol.--DurzaTwink (talk) 03:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Re-adoption

Hi would you like to re-adopt me now the crisis is now over?--DurzaTwink 19:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Then first say that I never spread any rumor about you. 12.4.192.249 (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC) PS: I'm editing from a store.

what crisis? 76.98.1.12 (talk) 20:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I think he probably means that rumor allegation. 12.4.192.249 (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC) (Jihoon)

ok that it, ive had enough, i will have a talk with you on monday and be prepared to change your lunch eating location. Sanjay517 (talk) 23:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

styrofoam email me on this situation and what actions should be taken . this has gone too far, durza twink you have alleged of doing something i didnt do.Sanjay517 (talk) 23:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I already emailed you on instructions. Plus, Brandon posted that he suspects you to be a sockpuppet on Misplaced Pages:AN#Durzatwink and Styrofoam1994. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 01:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

For your information Styrofoam1994, I did not put the sockpuppetry about Sanjay517 on WP:SSP. Plus, you already created a sockpuppetry case against me but it was dissmissed and it is still being talked discussed by admins--DurzaTwink 02:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes you did post it. Go look at the history. Also, the previous sockpuppetry case was dismissed because they thought it was a joke, as they thought about that fake warning message I gave you on your talk page. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 02:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

No sir, I did not post it on WP:SSP. I posted it in WP:AN and it was a suggestion.--DurzaTwink 02:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh I see. Maybe I didn't check the history. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 02:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

3RR violation

You have violated the WP:3RR policy at Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Durzatwink. You can be blocked from editing for a period of time for the reverts you've already done. Please don't do any more reverts on that page until allowed by the 3RR policy (i.e. 24 hours from your third-last revert on that page). Please don't delete another user's evidence from a page of that type in any case. --Coppertwig (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

But didn't 3RR only apply when 3 different editors revert something? In my case, User:Durzatwink was the only person who reverted my edits. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 03:36, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

No, I'm not aware of any such exception to the 3RR rule. The 3RR rule is very simple; it has very few exceptions. Maybe you can try to find a quote like that in the WP:3RR policy, but I'd be surprised. Recently I saw an example of someone blocked for 24 hours when there were only the two editors reverting back and forth, as you were doing in this case. --Coppertwig (talk) 03:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if I'm repeating myself, but I'd like to emphasise that in my opinion, it's highly improper to delete what has been presented as evidence by a party in a procedure like that, especially if you are one of the parties, even if you think the material is poorly written, irrelevant, false etc. You can just add your own refutation as part of your own evidence. If you think you're in a rare situation where there actually is a strong, valid reason for deleting something like that, you can try to get an uninvolved person to delete it. If nobody will, that's a sign that there isn't really a valid reason to delete it. I think you could be blocked for disruptive editing if you delete evidence, even if you don't violate 3RR. --Coppertwig (talk) 12:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting my misleading knowledge. _contribsSTYROFOAM☭1994 13:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)