This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) at 18:38, 18 February 2008 (→apoc: I'm sorry if I appeared to be acting rudely. I was unaware of any question. What was it?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:38, 18 February 2008 by Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) (→apoc: I'm sorry if I appeared to be acting rudely. I was unaware of any question. What was it?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Civility sanction I said on the second day of the workshop of the IRC case that I thought the Committee would have to be "very creative in seeking an appropriate and equitable set of remedies." Hardly an audacious prediction in the circumstances. It has proven a difficult case, and there have been moments when some of us had to "get out and push", as it were, by making concessions. I think the case has come together well over the past few days and now the end is in sight. I believe cooperation is essential for the health of the community. To help paper over the cracks I've accepted FloNight's suggestion that she draw up an enforceable remedy concerning me as an alternative to one that looks likely to fail in this case. That's both creative and sensible. The proximate cause of the arbitration case was an edit war that would not have started without my thoughtless choice of words. Part of this case has concerned widespread perceptions that some parties are privileged in some way. Those perceptions, which I believe to be false, can only be defused by painstaking work in the months going forwards, but this case makes a good start. --Tony Sidaway 00:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Tony Sidaway (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has engaged in repeated instances of incivility, personal attacks, and general lack of decorum befitting a Misplaced Pages editor. Previous warnings have not resolved the problem. Therefore, Tony Sidaway is subject to an editing restriction for one year. Should Tony Sidaway make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, Tony Sidaway may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 5 blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one month. All blocks are to be logged at User:Tony Sidaway/Civility sanction#Log of blocks. FloNight♥♥♥ 02:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'll treat that as enforceable. Other arbitrators may add endorsements if they want. --Tony Sidaway 02:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Centralising BetacommandBot discussion
Hi Tony. I noticed your comment at ANI asking people to stop going there with BetacommandBot complaints. In light of that, would you like to comment at the MfD of the page MickMacNee created to centralise discussion? Well, MickMacNee could have done a slightly more neutral job of that, but I think he did it in a good faith effort, and possibly a response to your request that a different venue be used, so maybe your input would be helpful there. You might also be interested in the related (the same two users) thread at ANI: Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Betacommand's use of bot on MickMacNee's talk page. Carcharoth (talk) 13:01, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- There is already a place for centralized discussion of Betacommandbot. It's at User talk:Betacommand. --Tony 17:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Your editing for LOM/A2A Project
Your a credit 2 it, your edits are really good. You have helped strentghen these articles on a huge scale. Well done. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺
17:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
apoc
You gonna answer me, or not?--Hammerandclaw (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I appeared to be acting rudely. I was unaware of any question. What was it? --Tony 18:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC)