This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Boothy443 (talk | contribs) at 23:01, 20 July 2005 (re:nomination). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:01, 20 July 2005 by Boothy443 (talk | contribs) (re:nomination)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Comments
re:nomination
No, if i thought i had a chance to be fairly looked at on the basis of my contributions to this site rather than my opinions of the, lack of standards for adminship, lack of accountability with the admins, my decision not to submit to arbitarity policies made on the fly, and how the current administration of the site seems to be more concerned with the idea of protecting their own backs then the protection of accuracy and neutrality of information provided and a policy of basic appeasement towards vandalism and people that are here to promote an agenda either from the right or the left in which many admins would rather ignore if it does not effect them or interject them selves in on one side or the other, among other things. I find the RFA not a election, for that is what it is, based on the qualifications of a user but no more then a popularity contest. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 23:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)