Misplaced Pages

:Peer review/Soprano Home Movies/archive1 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Peer review

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Wbm1058 (talk | contribs) at 14:17, 15 March 2015 ([]: cat:, replaced: <br/> Category:February 2008 peer reviews → <br/> <noinclude>Category:February 2008 peer reviews</noinclude> using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 14:17, 15 March 2015 by Wbm1058 (talk | contribs) ([]: cat:, replaced: <br/> Category:February 2008 peer reviews → <br/> <noinclude>Category:February 2008 peer reviews</noinclude> using AWB)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Soprano Home Movies

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Hey, I've listed this article about one of my favorite The Sopranos epsiodes for a peer review. I would like some feedback and comments on the overall quality of the article. I've modeled it after the Pilot (House) and Through the Looking Glass (Lost) articles (both featured). Although it's not as long as the latter, I think it covers all important aspects and follows Misplaced Pages:Television episodes closely. The article looked like this before I started working on it. The plot summary is a little longer than what's recommended but I really can't shorten it anymore without losing coherency, and as stated, "do not directly limit summaries if doing so makes them incoherent - the majority of good and featured episode articles overrun this limit slightly." I reckon there's some copy-editing to be made; as English is not my first language, I'm probably not too good at detecting weird and/or silly wordings. I know that the ratings part is just one long sentence but I really think it looks OK like that.

Much appreciated! –FunkyVoltron 17:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Category: