This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ultraviolet scissor flame (talk | contribs) at 19:00, 5 June 2008 (→Butter: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:00, 5 June 2008 by Ultraviolet scissor flame (talk | contribs) (→Butter: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Am I the dead guy or one of the dogs? Back, I'd just be a troublemaker. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 21:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- You can't be one of those dogs. They have legs. Bishonen | talk 23:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC).
Fair use rationale for Image:Lincolnfry.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lincolnfry.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Misplaced Pages articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Butter
Butter has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Ultra! 19:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)