This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 207.200.116.68 (talk) at 07:56, 13 August 2005 (deleting ad hominem personal attacks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:56, 13 August 2005 by 207.200.116.68 (talk) (deleting ad hominem personal attacks)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This page is ad hominem/poisoning the well type personal attacks enforcing tyranny of the majority in violation of policy wikipeddia:no personal attacks "comment on content, not on the contributor" as well as consensus decision-making through principled negotiation in which "BOTH POINTS OF VIEW NEED TO BE INCLUDED to achieve Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view which is conduct unbecoming Admins. Is there something about, "Comment on content, not on the contributor that you find difficult to understand? This is not rocket science. Shame on you!
It is not fair that those of the majority point of view should control the content of an article through force of numbers, getting more reverts than the minority side can muster, or failing that, lock the page in a version that looks good from your side's point of view. This is argumentum ad numerum, an appeal to the popularity of a point of view which is logical fallacy and produces an encyclopedia of Obscurantism. Right, boys?